The Ambiguity of Representations in the Political Context of Rondônia Since 2018: Theoretical Notes Based on Bergsonism
Immediate. Forgetting. Recognition. Henri Bergson. Paul Ricoeur.
The analysis of this dissertation sought to understand, within the context of Rondônia after 2018, the notions of the principle of immediacy and forgetting in light of recognition. As this is not a metaphysical but a heuristic research, the signs and meanings contributed to an interpretation of memory in Henri Bergson. The rich polysemy can be an important key to understanding, at the same time, the relationship between Bergson's philosophy of memory and the confrontation between memory and imagination in Memory, History, Forgetting by Paul Ricoeur, allowing for a theoretical foundation in the discussions about the elaboration of the past through the brain and the perceptive form awakened in subjects in their inherent relations to their own experience in Rondônia. The decisive moment of the phenomenology of memory between the intellectuals Henri Bergson and Paul Ricoeur in the recognition of the self specified: considering the theory of these intellectuals and identifying the relevance of their thought to issues concerning the problem of narrative and the boundary between the narrator and the listener. The relationship that connects both is linked by the presupposition of a reference field that does not eliminate the established alienation caused by the insufficiency of understanding the diversities found in the Amazonian space of Rondônia.