THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE: THE LITIGANT AND DECISION-MAKING PROFILE OF THE SPECIAL CIVIL COURT OF CACOAL/ROSpecial Courts. Excess. Litigation. profiles. Justice. Assessment.
The present dissertation has as main object to examine the access to justice in the Special Court of the Comarca de Cacoal/RO, in order to verify if its facets are being respected in the aforementioned court. In addition, to discuss whether the aforementioned guarantee as a Fundamental Right as originally conceived is being met and to verify the claimant and decision-making profile of the aforementioned court in the period from 2017 to 2020. The text focuses on and relates access to justice with the Special Courts through the collection of data promoted at national, state and municipal levels on the issue, using data collected at the National Council of Justice via its Justice in Numbers System and by the Court of Justice of Rondônia, via its Eólis system, developed and administered by its General Justice Department. The approach carried out was quali-quanti in order to demonstrate the existence of a system, Civil Special Courts, idealized, structured and developed to serve a specific segment of the population and that, for various reasons, meets segments (users) and/or other demands. (types of actions) other than those (those) for which it was originally designed, hence the importance of understanding and knowing the profile of its litigants. In this context, the present proposal questions the reasons for the intense judicialization from the survey of empirical data in the unit of Special Courts of Cacoal/RO; describes the litigant and decision-making profile of the Special Civil Court of Cacoal/RO and what would be the effective alternatives to reduce the increase in the number of demands as a result of the analysis of available peacemaking instruments, especially as a condition for establishing judicial policies aimed at optimizing the jurisdictional service, among them, the presentation of an electronic tool with the purpose of giving voice to the jurisdiction with a view to their participation in the implementation of actions to better meet their demands.